2000 Caterham 7 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Caterham 7 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 1040 kg more than 2000 Caterham 7.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (281 Nm @ 5600 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Caterham 7. (125 Nm @ 8250 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Caterham 7 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Caterham | Mini |
| Model | 7 | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 10750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 8250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 58 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 440 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4133 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2595 mm |
