2000 Caterham C21 vs. 1967 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2000 Caterham C21 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham C21 (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1967 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham C21 should accelerate faster than 1967 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 380 kg more than 2000 Caterham C21.
Because 1967 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Caterham C21. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 145 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham C21 | 1967 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Caterham | Jeep |
Model | C21 | CJ5 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2060 mm |