2000 Caterham C21 vs. 1975 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 2000 Caterham C21 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1975 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham C21 (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1975 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham C21 should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Mazda RX-3 weights approximately 200 kg more than 2000 Caterham C21.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Caterham C21 (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda RX-3. (136 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Caterham C21 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham C21 | 1975 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Caterham | Mazda |
Model | C21 | RX-3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2320 mm |