2000 Caterham C21 vs. 1984 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Caterham C21 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham C21 (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1984 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham C21 should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Ranger.
Because 1984 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Caterham C21. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1984 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 2000 Caterham C21 has manual transmission. 2000 Caterham C21 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham C21 | 1984 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Caterham | Ford |
Model | C21 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4690 mm |