2000 Caterham C21 vs. 1997 Acura TL
To start off, 2000 Caterham C21 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura TL (200 HP) has 85 more horse power than 2000 Caterham C21. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2000 Caterham C21.
Because 2000 Caterham C21 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Caterham C21. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 2000 Caterham C21 has manual transmission. 2000 Caterham C21 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham C21 | 1997 Acura TL | |
Make | Caterham | Acura |
Model | C21 | TL |
Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2840 mm |