2000 Caterham C21 vs. 2005 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Caterham C21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Caterham C21 would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2000 Caterham C21. (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2000 Caterham C21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 1059 kg more than 2000 Caterham C21. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Caterham C21. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Caterham C21.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham C21 | 2005 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Caterham | Chrysler |
Model | C21 | 300 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 3516 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 340 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1709 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3050 mm |