2000 Caterham C21 vs. 2005 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2005 Mazda MPV is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Caterham C21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Caterham C21 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda MPV (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2000 Caterham C21. (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2000 Caterham C21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda MPV weights approximately 1061 kg more than 2000 Caterham C21. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Caterham C21 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Caterham C21. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda MPV (271 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Caterham C21. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Caterham C21.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham C21 | 2005 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Caterham | Mazda |
Model | C21 | MPV |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 271 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1711 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2850 mm |