2000 Caterham C21 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Caterham C21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Caterham C21 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Caterham C21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham C21 (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham C21 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 515 kg more than 2000 Caterham C21.
Because 2000 Caterham C21 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Caterham C21. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Caterham C21 (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 2000 Caterham C21 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Caterham C21 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Caterham | Renault |
Model | C21 | Clio |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 17.9:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2630 mm |