2000 Chevrolet Adventure vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Adventure is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Adventure weights approximately 305 kg more than 1968 Ford Mustang.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Adventure, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Adventure | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Adventure | Mustang |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1165 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2750 mm |