2000 Chevrolet Adventure vs. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Adventure is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher.
Because 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Adventure, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Adventure | 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Adventure | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2850 mm |
