2000 Chevrolet Adventure vs. 1981 Volvo 240
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Adventure is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 240 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Adventure weights approximately 100 kg more than 1981 Volvo 240.
Because 1981 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Adventure, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Adventure has automatic transmission and 1981 Volvo 240 has manual transmission. 1981 Volvo 240 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Adventure will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Adventure | 1981 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Adventure | 240 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2660 mm |