2000 Chevrolet Adventure vs. 1995 Volvo 960
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Adventure is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Volvo 960 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Volvo 960 weights approximately 30 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Adventure.
Because 1995 Volvo 960 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Volvo 960. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Adventure, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Adventure has automatic transmission and 1995 Volvo 960 has manual transmission. 1995 Volvo 960 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Adventure will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Adventure | 1995 Volvo 960 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Adventure | 960 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1500 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2780 mm |