2000 Chevrolet Adventure vs. 2009 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Adventure. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Adventure would be higher.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Adventure. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Adventure has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda CX-7 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Adventure will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Adventure | 2009 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Adventure | CX-7 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2760 mm |