2000 Chevrolet Adventure vs. 2009 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2009 Subaru Forester is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Adventure. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Adventure would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Subaru Forester weights approximately 163 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Adventure.
Because 2009 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Adventure. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Adventure | 2009 Subaru Forester | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
| Model | Adventure | Forester |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 169 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1633 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2620 mm |
