2000 Chevrolet Adventure vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Adventure. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Adventure would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 308 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Adventure.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Adventure, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Adventure | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Cadillac |
| Model | Adventure | CTS |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 318 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1778 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2880 mm |
