2000 Chevrolet Adventure vs. 2012 Kia Forte
To start off, 2012 Kia Forte is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Adventure. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Adventure would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Adventure weights approximately 229 kg more than 2012 Kia Forte.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Adventure | 2012 Kia Forte | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Kia |
| Model | Adventure | Forte |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1241 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2649 mm |
