2000 Chevrolet Adventure vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Adventure. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Adventure would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 451 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Adventure.
Because 2012 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Adventure. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Adventure | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Adventure | XC60 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1921 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2748 mm |