2000 Chevrolet Adventure vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Adventure. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Adventure would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 388 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Adventure.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Adventure. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Adventure | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Cadillac |
| Model | Adventure | CTS |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1858 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2880 mm |
