2000 Chevrolet Adventure vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Adventure. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Adventure would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 1200 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Adventure.
Because 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Adventure, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Adventure | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
Make | Chevrolet | Cadillac |
Model | Adventure | ESCALADE |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 327 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 2670 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2947 mm |