2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1950 Morris Oxford
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 185 kg more than 1950 Morris Oxford.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Morris Oxford. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Morris Oxford. (88 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Morris Oxford.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Astro | 1950 Morris Oxford | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Morris |
| Model | Astro | Oxford |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 1476 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 40 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1002 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 40 L |
