2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1960 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 4 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Ford Zodiac. (187 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 1960 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Astro | Zodiac |
Year Released | 2000 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 76 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 187 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1191 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |