2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1961 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 192 kg more than 1961 Sunbeam Alpine.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Sunbeam Alpine. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Sunbeam Alpine. (127 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Sunbeam Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 1961 Sunbeam Alpine | |
Make | Chevrolet | Sunbeam |
Model | Astro | Alpine |
Year Released | 2000 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 80 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 127 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 40 L |