2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1962 Maserati Tipo 64
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 (317 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. (184 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 1255 kg more than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Maserati |
Model | Astro | Tipo 64 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1895 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2210 mm |