2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 287 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Astro | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 1189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2290 mm |