2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 633 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Astro | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Astro | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |
