2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1966 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (184 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 1463 kg more than 1966 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Lotus Seven. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 1966 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Astro | Seven |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Body Type | Minivan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1895 kg | 432 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2240 mm |