2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1967 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 weights approximately 173 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. (194 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 1967 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Willys-Overland |
Model | Astro | Aero-Willys 2600 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 194 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2740 mm |