2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1969 TVR Tuscan
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 TVR Tuscan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 TVR Tuscan would be higher. At 4,725 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 TVR Tuscan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 322 kg more than 1969 TVR Tuscan.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 TVR Tuscan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Astro has automatic transmission and 1969 TVR Tuscan has manual transmission. 1969 TVR Tuscan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Astro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Astro | 1969 TVR Tuscan | |
| Make | Chevrolet | TVR |
| Model | Astro | Tuscan |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1969 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 4725 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 229 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 65 L |
