2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1972 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Holden Belmont weights approximately 153 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Holden Belmont. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Belmont. (229 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 1972 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Astro | Belmont |
Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 116 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 229 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2830 mm |