2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1973 Austin Allegro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 297 kg more than 1973 Austin Allegro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Austin Allegro. (132 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 1973 Austin Allegro | |
Make | Chevrolet | Austin |
Model | Astro | Allegro |
Year Released | 2000 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 1748 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 71 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 132 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 47 L |