2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1977 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 372 kg more than 1977 Triumph Spitfire.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Triumph Spitfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Triumph Spitfire. (100 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Astro | 1977 Triumph Spitfire | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Astro | Spitfire |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 1492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 56 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2110 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 33 L |
