2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1982 Lancia Beta
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 127 kg more than 1982 Lancia Beta.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Lancia Beta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Astro has automatic transmission and 1982 Lancia Beta has manual transmission. 1982 Lancia Beta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Astro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 1982 Lancia Beta | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lancia |
Model | Astro | Beta |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 51 L |