2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1985 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 293 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 1985 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Astro | Cougar |
Year Released | 2000 | 1985 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2650 mm |