2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1995 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Jaguar XJ220. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Jaguar XJ220 (968 Nm) has 630 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. (338 Nm). This means 1995 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 1995 Jaguar XJ220 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Astro | XJ220 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 3492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 968 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |