2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1999 Suzuki Wagon R+
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki Wagon R+. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki Wagon R+ would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 207 kg more than 1999 Suzuki Wagon R+.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Suzuki Wagon R+. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Suzuki Wagon R+. (93 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Suzuki Wagon R+.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Astro | 1999 Suzuki Wagon R+ | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Astro | Wagon R+ |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 1171 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 68 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 42 L |
