2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2005 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2005 Mazda Tribute is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 320 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (262 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Astro | 2005 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Astro | Tribute |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 262 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1507 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 62 L |
