2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 730 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. (339 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Astro | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 4013 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 344 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1917 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 85 L |