2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2006 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2006 Mazda MPV is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda MPV weights approximately 524 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda MPV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda MPV. (271 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 2006 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Astro | MPV |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Minivan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 271 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1711 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 75 L |