2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2007 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2007 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Chevrolet Malibu. (206 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 2007 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | Astro | Malibu |
Year Released | 2000 | 2007 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 144 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 206 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2860 mm |