2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 978 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (278 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Astro | Grand Voyager |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Body Type | Minivan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 3301 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 278 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 2165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 75 L |