2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2009 Acura CSX
To start off, 2009 Acura CSX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 13 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. (184 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 582 kg more than 2009 Acura CSX.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Acura CSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 2009 Acura CSX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Acura |
Model | Astro | CSX |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1895 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |