2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Astro | Epica |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2700 mm |