2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2010 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2010 Nissan Murano is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Murano weights approximately 671 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Nissan Murano. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan Murano. (336 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan Murano.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Astro | 2010 Nissan Murano | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Astro | Murano |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 336 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1858 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2824 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 82 L |
