2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2011 Aston Martin Virage
To start off, 2011 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2011 Aston Martin Virage is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Aston Martin Virage weights approximately 598 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Aston Martin Virage. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Aston Martin Virage (569 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. (339 Nm). This means 2011 Aston Martin Virage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Astro | 2011 Aston Martin Virage | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Aston Martin |
| Model | Astro | Virage |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 490 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4704 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1283 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2741 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 78 L |
