2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2011 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2011 Renault Scenic is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Renault Scenic weights approximately 28 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Renault Scenic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Scenic. (191 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 2011 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Astro | Scenic |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Minivan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 133 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 191 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |