2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2012 BMW X6
To start off, 2012 BMW X6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 BMW X6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW X6 weights approximately 1428 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW X6 (779 Nm) has 440 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. (339 Nm). This means 2012 BMW X6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Astro | 2012 BMW X6 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | BMW |
| Model | Astro | X6 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 4400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 480 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 779 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 2615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4879 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1689 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2934 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 85 L |
