2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2012 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC70 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 693 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC70 (400 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. (339 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 2012 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Astro | XC70 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 400 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2815 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |