2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 593 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. (233 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | Astro | Equinox |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 233 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2857 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 71 L |