2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE
To start off, 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE weights approximately 435 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE (353 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. (339 Nm). This means 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Astro | 200 CONVERTIBLE |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 279 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1622 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 2121 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2765 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 64 L |