2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2013 Jaguar XF

To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. (184 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 107 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (340 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. (338 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet Astro 2013 Jaguar XF
Make Chevrolet Jaguar
Model Astro XF
Year Released 2000 2013
Body Type Minivan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4293 cc 2995 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 184 HP 335 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 338 Nm 340 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 5000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.4 mm 89 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline / Electric Hybrid
Drive Type 4WD AWD
Transmission Type Manual CVT
Number of Seats 8 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1895 kg 2002 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 4961 mm
Vehicle Width 1980 mm 2053 mm
Vehicle Height 1910 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2909 mm